|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd1a microbeads Cd1a Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd1a microbeads/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd1a microbeads - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd1c apc Cd1c Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd1c apc/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd1c apc - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
monoclonal mouse anti human cd1a pe Monoclonal Mouse Anti Human Cd1a Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/monoclonal mouse anti human cd1a pe/product/R&D Systems Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal mouse anti human cd1a pe - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
cd1c ![]() Cd1c, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd1c/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd1c - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Diaclone
cd1a mab ![]() Cd1a Mab, supplied by Diaclone, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd1a mab/product/Diaclone Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd1a mab - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
85/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio X Cell
anti human cd1a ![]() Anti Human Cd1a, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti human cd1a/product/Bio X Cell Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human cd1a - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
88/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bio-Rad
mouse antihuman antibodies ![]() Mouse Antihuman Antibodies, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse antihuman antibodies/product/Bio-Rad Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse antihuman antibodies - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Miltenyi Biotec
biotinylated anti human antibodies against cd1a ![]() Biotinylated Anti Human Antibodies Against Cd1a, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated anti human antibodies against cd1a/product/Miltenyi Biotec Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti human antibodies against cd1a - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
anti cd1a pe ![]() Anti Cd1a Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cd1a pe/product/R&D Systems Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd1a pe - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Novus Biologicals
flow cytometry ![]() Flow Cytometry, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/flow cytometry/product/Novus Biologicals Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flow cytometry - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Proteintech
cd14 ![]() Cd14, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd14/product/Proteintech Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd14 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
OriGene
cd1a ![]() Cd1a, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/cd1a/product/OriGene Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd1a - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibodies.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Purification
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibody cocktail for lung DC staining.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Flow cytometric analyses of human lung DC subsets. As depicted, human lung samples are pregated on single, live, CD45 + cells. The CD45 + population of the lung then is further gated on CD3 − and CD16/CD19/CD20 − cells (also called LIN − ), before gating on all HLA‐DR + cells. From here, monocytes are excluded by gating on CD88 − cells only and CD14 − CD88 − and CD14 + CD88 − are used for subsequent gating on the different DC subsets. Within the CD88 − population, pDC can be identified as CD123 + CD169 − cells and pre‐DC as CD123 int/+ CD169 + cells. Subsequently, the CD123/CD169 double negative population is further gated on CD141 + cDC1 (optional also CADM1 + ) or CD1c + cells, which contain a mixture of cDC2 (DC2 and DC3). These CD1c + cDC2 can be subdivided using CD5 and CD14 and by gating on the CD5 + CD14 − DC2, CD5 − CD14 − DC3, and CD5 − CD14 + DC3 subsets. Samples shown here were acquired on a CYTEK Aurora 5L.
Article Snippet:
Techniques:
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of marker expression on analyzed cell populations.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Marker, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reagents and antibodies used for flow cytometric analysis.
Article Snippet:
Techniques:
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Staining workflow for human skin DC panel.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining, Incubation, Blocking Assay
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis of human skin. The skin was enzymatically digested to generate single‐cell suspensions. (A) Gating strategy for viable CD45 + cells after exclusion of cellular debris, doublets, and dead cells. (B) CD3 + T cells and CD19 + B cells as well as CD14 + cells were excluded before DC characterization. (C) HLA‐DR expressing cells comprise DC, which can be further subdivided into CD141 + CD1c + cDC1 and CD1c + subsets, consisting of CD207 + LC and CD207 − cDC2. (D) Surface expression of co‐stimulatory markers CD40, CD80, and CD86 on the indicated DC subsets: cDC1 (orange), cDC2 (grey), and LC (blue). MFI values are shown. cDC, conventional DC; LC, Langerhans cells.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of marker expression on skin DC populations.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Marker, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reagents, antibodies, chemicals, and solutions.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Dilution of antibodies used for flow cytometry.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Cytometry
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Gating strategy for the characterization of dendritic cell subsets in human gingiva. (i) Cells are pregated according to their size and granularity (FSC‐A/SSC‐A) to exclude debris and dead cells. (ii, iii) Doublets are excluded by gating on the FSC and SSC area (A) and height (H). (iv) Red blood cells are excluded by using SSC‐B‐H and SSC‐H. (v) Dead cells are excluded using Zombie staining. (vi) CD45 + hematopoietic cells are selected. (vii) CD3 + T cells and CD19 + B cells are excluded. (viii) CD66b + neutrophils and CD56 + NK cells are excluded. (ix) HLA‐DR + cells are selected. (x) CD123 + , CD45RA + , and CD123‐CD45RA +∖− cells are further gated, which represent the pre‐DC, pDC, and DC subpopulations, respectively. (xi) CD5 + AXL + cells represent the pre‐DC subpopulation and CD5‐AXL‐ cells constitute the pDC subpopulation. (xii) LC cells are isolated from other DC cells by their expression of both CD207 and Epcam. (xiii) Conventional DC (cDC) are divided into cDC1 and cDC2 according to their CD141 and CD1c expression. While cDC1 are positive for CD141 and negative for CD1c, cDC2 are positive for CD1a and negative for CD141. Data acquisition was performed on a Cytek Aurora Flow Cytometry System and data was analyzed using FlowJo V10.8.1 software.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining, Isolation, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Software
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of marker expression on analyzed cell populations.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Marker, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Used antibodies.
Article Snippet:
Techniques:
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of marker expression on analyzed cell populations.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Marker, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reagents and antibodies use for flow cytometric analysis.
Article Snippet:
Techniques:
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Staining workflow for human tumor cDC panel.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining, Incubation
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Proposed tumor DC staining panel.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining, Marker
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of marker expression on analyzed cell populations.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Marker, Expressing
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Reagents and antibodies used for flow cytometric analysis
Article Snippet:
Techniques:
Journal: European Journal of Immunology
Article Title: Guidelines for preparation and flow cytometry analysis of human nonlymphoid tissue DC
doi: 10.1002/eji.202250325
Figure Lengend Snippet: Staining workflow for human TDLN cDC panel.
Article Snippet:
Techniques: Staining, Incubation
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: Incubation of PBMCs with PC affects frequencies of monocytes, macrophages, and CD4 T cells. A, Flow cytometric analysis of PBMCs from UC patients (n = 13) and non-UC donors (n = 28) that were incubated in the absence (control n = 39) or presence of PC (n = 41) and PHA (n = 40) for 48 hours depicted as boxplot diagrams. B, Cell trace CFSE dilution of CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes. C, Correlation analysis of frequencies of CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes and Th1 of Th2 cells depicted as scatter plots. The method was Pearson; numbers display correlation coefficients (cor-values) and P values. D, Flow cytometric analysis of CD4+ T cells for intracellular expression of IFNγ, IL-4, or IL-17 depicted as boxplots. PBMCs (n = 4) were incubated in the absence or presence of PC and anti-CD1a antibody. For comparison of groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD was conducted. Boxes represent upper and lower quartiles, whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points ( *** 0.001; ** 0.01; *0.05).
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Incubation, Control, Expressing, Comparison
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: Anti-CD1a antibodies affect frequencies of CD4+ T cells. Flow cytometric analysis of PBMCs from 2 different donors that were incubated in triplicate for 5 days with PC in the presence (n = 6) or absence of anti-CD1a antibodies (n = 6) or PHA (n = 6) depicted as boxplot diagrams. For comparison of groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD was conducted. Boxes represent upper and lower quartiles, whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points ( *** 0.001; ** 0.01; *0.05).
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Incubation, Comparison
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: Ex vivo analysis of CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes for co-expression of CCR2, CD86, and TSLPR. Flow cytometric analysis of PBMCs from UC patients (n = 21) and non-UC (n = 9) donors depicted as boxplot diagrams. Boxes represent upper and lower quartiles, whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points. For comparison of groups, a Student t test was performed ( *** 0.001; ** 0.01; *0.05).
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Ex Vivo, Expressing, Comparison
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: TAG and cholesterol levels increase in the NSG-UC mouse model and correlate with CD1a-expressing monocytes. NSG-UC mice were engrafted with PBMCs derived from UC patients (n = 4), challenged with 10% ethanol at day 8 and 50% ethanol at days 15 and 18. A, TAG and cholesterol levels depicted as boxplot diagrams; nchallenged group (control, n = 12), ethanol challenged group (ethanol, n = 21). Whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points. B, Correlation analysis of CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes with TAG and cholesterol levels depicted as scatter plots. (TAG n = 24, cholesterol n = 25). The method was Spearman; numbers display correlation coefficients ( rho values) and P values.
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Expressing, Derivative Assay, Control
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: NSG-UC mice benefit from treatment with anti-CD1a antibodies. NSG mice were engrafted with PBMCs derived from UC patients (NSG-UC, n = 3) and 1 non-UC donor (NSG-non-UC). Mice were challenged with 10% ethanol at day 8 and 50% ethanol at days 15 and 18 and treated with 30 µg of anti-CD1a antibody or isotype control at days 7, 14, and 17. Control: NSG-non-UC, n = 4; NSG-UC, n = 8. Challenged control (ethanol + isotype): NSG-non-UC, n = 4; NSG-UC, n = 16. Challenged and treated with anti-CD1a antibody (ethanol + anti-CD1a): NSG-non-UC, n = 4; NSG-UC, n = 16. A, Clinical colon and histological scores of NSG-UC mice depicted as boxplot diagrams. B, Macrophotographs of colons at autopsy. a, NSG-UC unchallenged control. b, NSG-non-UC challenged control. c, NSG-UC challenged control, NSG-UC. d, Challenged and treated with anti-CD1a antibody. C, Photomicrographs of H&E-stained sections of distal parts of the colon from mice. Arrows indicate edema and influx of inflammatory cells. D, Frequencies of human leucocytes isolated from colons of mice. Samples from each group were pooled. Mean values are given; error bars are SD. Quantification was performed using flow cytometric analysis. Sample sizes: control n = 3, ethanol + isotype n = 3, ethanol + anti-CD1a n = 3. E, mRNA expression levels of mTARC, mTGFß1, HGF, and hIFNγ depicted as boxplots. Lg: delta CT, logarithmic delta cycle threshold. Boxes represent upper and lower quartiles. Whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points. Labels given on x-axes on the bottom row apply to all charts. For comparison of groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD was conducted.
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Derivative Assay, Control, Staining, Isolation, Expressing, Comparison
Journal: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Article Title: CD1a-Expressing Monocytes as Mediators of Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy073
Figure Lengend Snippet: Treatment of NSG-UC mice with anti-CD1a antibodies affects CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes. NSG mice were engrafted and treated as in . Human leucocytes were isolated from mouse spleen and subjected to flow cytometric analysis. A, Frequencies of CD14+ CD1a+ and CD11b+ CD1a+ cells depicted as boxplot diagrams. Boxes represent upper and lower quartiles. Whiskers represent variability, and outliers are plotted as individual points. B, Correlation analysis of frequencies of CD14+ CD1a+ monocytes with subsets of B and T cells cells depicted as scatter plots. The method was Spearman; numbers display correlation coefficients ( rho values) and P values.
Article Snippet: To analyze the effect of an anti-CD1a antibody on cells stimulated with PC, cells were incubated for 1 hour with 10 μg/mL of
Techniques: Isolation
Journal: International Journal of Oncology
Article Title: E6-regulated overproduction of prostaglandin E2 may inhibit migration of dendritic cells in human papillomavirus 16-positive cervical lesions
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.4983
Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of DCs in human papillomavirus 16-positive cervical lesions. (A) CD1a and CD83 immunostaining in cervical biopsy specimens. Original magnification, ×200. Semi-quantitative evaluation of CD1a and CD83 expression was performed in normal squamous epithelium (n=4), LSIL (n=5), HSIL (n=5) and SCC (n=5). * P<0.05 vs. Normal. (B) Preliminary verification in animal experiments. Qtracker™ 705-labeled DCs were injected into control mice, CaSki-bearing mice and SiHa-bearing mice. Popliteal lymph nodes were collected and the number of labeled DCs was detected by flow cytometry. DCs, dendritic cells; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HPF, high-power field; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SCC, squamous carcinoma.
Article Snippet: After dewaxing and rehydration, heat-mediated antigen retrieval was performed with 1 mM EDTA (pH 9.0) in a pressure boiler for 10 min. Microsomal PGE synthase (mPGES)-1 (1:100; cat. no. 160140; Cayman Chemical Company), mPGES-2 (1:100; cat. no. 160145; Cayman Chemical Company) and cytosolic PGE synthase (cPGES) (1:100; cat. no. 18219; Cayman Chemical Company), CD83 (1:50; cat. no. bs-4826R; BIOSS) and
Techniques: Expressing, Immunostaining, Labeling, Injection, Flow Cytometry